Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swarmcast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Swarmcast

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company is/was not notable. Reliable sources are absent. It also fails to meet WP:N and WP:ORG. Sharky tale (talk) 10:18, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Uncontroversially fails WP:ORG, no sourcing in article, no coverage in RS. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:29, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteI really did try to dig up independent, reliable sources on this one. But returned empty handed. I don't think this passes the minimum necessary standards required of a Wikipedia article, JeanPaulMontmartre (talk) 12:43, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. lacks reliable coverage to qualify GNG. TheChronium 15:00, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Aishaa14 (talk) 19:54, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Inadequate and unsatisfactory sourcesDiamondchandelier (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.