Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swap Meet (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:19, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Swap Meet (film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFO, WP:NFSOURCES and WP:SIGCOV. I found no suitable or reliable sources or reviews to pass WP:NEXIST in a WP:BEFORE. The Film Creator (talk) 20:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep LA Times [1] review DonaldD23 talk to me 23:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep with LA Times review and TV guide review, both now in the article reception section, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:50, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw the nomination per consensus and per WP:NEXIST since there are reviews from TV Guide and the LA Times that exist. The Film Creator (talk) 10:00, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.