Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Krishnanand (Mahamandleshwar)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Swami Krishnanand (Mahamandleshwar)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vast majority of the article is about one event (him disappearing, then turning up again after six months - well...). The rest doesn't look particularly notable either, if you're conversant with Indian religion. Black Kite (talk) 18:56, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 00:00, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's more important to be conversant with Indian news. No, the whole nation did not "go to surprise". There was a couple of cycles of news coverage, in the Hindustan Times and a couple of others, none of which actually gave much space to covering this person xyrself, and that's it. This person's life and work are not documented in any kind of depth at all. A Wikipedia biography of this person cannot be written in accord with our content policies. As can be clearly seen. Uncle G (talk) 23:25, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E, WP:MILL, and WP:TNT. Even if this guy had continuing notability, and wasn't run of the mill, this areticle is not up to middle-school standards of writing. Bearian (talk) 16:05, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.