Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Svensson's law
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Tim Vickers (talk) 19:03, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Svensson's law (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to be a hoax. No Google hits other than the article itself. KurtRaschke (talk) 00:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as it appears to be a hoax. Nothing cited, nothing especially notable. Happyme22 (talk) 00:50, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Quick Delete. I'm coming up with nothing but fresh-air on this, even in some obscure academic sources. No brainer. Aardvarkvarkvark (talk) 01:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as I can't find anything confirming that it exists. Soxred 93 03:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete My olfactory detects a hoax. Ecoleetage (talk) 03:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete created by a single purpose account, Ness2008 with possible view of propagating a hoax Ohconfucius (talk) 03:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete, I'm going with nonsense. The article doesn't actually say what the law is, it only says what it describes or explains, and that Moore's Law is derived from it. Utter bollocks, this one. Someone else can tag this. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.