Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzie (2007 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:18, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suzie (2007 film)[edit]

Suzie (2007 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm unable to find independent, third-party reliable sources in a search to show that this film meets the general notability guideline. There does not appear to be any other evidence of notability as described in Wikipedia:Notability_(films) --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:23, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Film release year was 2006, not 2007. See this. Schmidt, Michael Q. 03:59, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Delete Not notable. It was shown at a few small film festivals and was released on DVD, but doesn't seem to have received any critical attention. My Google search can't find any reviews, IMDb doesn't list any external critics' reviews (and they list critics we wouldn't consider reliable sources), and it doesn't have a Rotten Tomatoes page. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:02, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.