Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sutlej Reformed Church of Pakistan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:15, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sutlej Reformed Church of Pakistan[edit]

Sutlej Reformed Church of Pakistan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seams that this topic lacks WP:NOTABILITY. Google news search returns only one result, albeit with no WP:significant coverage ([1] and its Chinese version). Vanjagenije (talk) 19:32, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 03:39, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 03:39, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The nominator is correct; there's only a single source. The subject does, however, have a strong presence on social media. This seems like yet another attempt by obscure South Asian religious groups to exploit Wikipedia as a means of promotion. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:04, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- This purports to be a denomination, which we normally regard as notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete To paraphrase WP:N, no denomination is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists. Evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition in multiple reliable sources. I will gladly reassess my opinion if/when reliable sources are presented. --FyzixFighter (talk) 13:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.