Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sustainable Transport Northamptonshire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sustainable Transport Northamptonshire[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-profit with mainly local coverage. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Burr. Chuka Chief_talk 17:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support: I wrote the articles. I have frequent contact with Harry (young not-for-profit administrator of this organisation), and he's due to be in some national press/magazines/media in the coming months. Maybe this article is too late, in fact. Not many people like Harry exist in the UK, he deserves a spotlight, don't you think? :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by HumveeHardhat (talk • contribs) 17:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the content of the article seems excessive and in support of a local issue... So, it seems it will not pass WP:NONPROFIT, which is :

Organizations are usually notable if they meet both of the following standards:

The scope of their activities is national or international in scale.

The organization has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization.

I am open to reconsider if any good argument is in support of keeping it. Kolma8 (talk) 20:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify Per my reasoning at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Burr Jumpytoo Talk 21:44, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support:~~ To respond to you, Kolma8, Sustainable Transport Holding's scope of activities is not just a local scale. Some of their projects reach places such as Lutterworth (very much outside Northamptonshire), and Milton Keynes, a large city. They are not just in Northamptonshire anymore, although their name suggests otherwise. The organisation has received coverage in regional news sources such as BBC Radio Northampton (covering the entire county), and 3 different news publications across the South East and the East/West Midlands. HumveeHardhat (talk) 21:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a local organization that fails WP:NONPROFIT. 5/11 sources currently given are primary, which help to point out that this is really just an article about a subject that has local rather than general interest.Possibly (talk) 03:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as Kolma8 and HighKing have already pointed out, this organisation does not satisfy inclusion criteria. Admittedly, the inclusion criteria for organisations are a bit tougher than most but it's for good reason Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per above fails in WP:GNG. Setreis (talk) 08:22, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above; fails GNG Nightfury 14:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough sources for GNG. Widefox; talk 18:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.