Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susanna Gregory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 01:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Susanna Gregory[edit]
No reviews or awards, non-notable IronDuke 19:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable, search engines provide sources such as this or this.--Húsönd 21:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Have you seen WP:BIO, where notability is conferred for "Published authors, editors and photographers who received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work"? Being on Amazon is not a review, and the interview you reference is from a source I've never heard of. Is the source itself notable? IronDuke 21:51, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment In fact, I do agree that this author isn't the best sourced I've seen around. But with so many books published and thousands of results on Yahoo! and Google, I'd say that she appears to be notable enough to justify inclusion. The article is likely to be expanded so I believe there's no need to delete it.--Húsönd 22:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Now there are sources. Added 8 reviews from Publishers Weekly and Library Journal. That plus numerous books by major publishers establishes notability. How do we check actual sales of the books? Edison 04:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Edison. Kavadi carrier 04:59, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable author--Edchilvers 14:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. --badlydrawnjeff talk 14:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Well-known author who is the subject of many independent sources. -- Necrothesp 16:50, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per above comments.Dahliarose 23:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.