Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivors Strike Back

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survivors Strike Back[edit]

As much of a fan of Survivor as I am, I don't see how this meets WP:WEB. Prod tag removed by an anonymous editor without explanation. Maxamegalon2000 00:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails all the criteria specified at WP:WEB. -Panser Born- (talk) 01:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per Panser Born. Acalamari 02:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - no asssertion of notability. Natalie 14:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the editors of the blog are all with articles, means they are notable. Wooyi^{Talk, Editor review} 16:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:WEB. Wooyi's argument above means that "Survivors Strike Back" may merit a mention on the Survivor article and the respective articles of the bloggers, but not its own article. A Train^talk 17:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all this information could be placed on the individual survivor's pages. Darth griz⁹⁸ 03:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I dont see the point and it doesnt deserve to have its own artcle.--Joebengo 06:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No reason to have it Survivorfan101 13:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.