Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivor (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 05:15, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor (film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film has not yet entered production, per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 13:57, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The film is already in production as "pre-production" and development, scouting for locations have all been settled. Meanwhile, the other author's source is still being considered to be filmed, so I suggest to leave it as it is. ZERO-MINUS-TENUser talk:ZeroMinusTen 07:08, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles". "Pre-production" is not "production", it is what comes before production. More to the point, it is not prinicipal photography (as that is clearly part of "production"). - SummerPhD (talk) 15:55, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per being somewhat TOO SOON. WIth Milla Jovovich and the rest of this high profile cast, there is no doubt that this will be quite notable in another 12-18 months. Until then there might be sourced mentions in the various articles of cast and director about their "upcoming" project, but with a predicted 2015 release date, it is simply premature. Allow undeletion or recreation when principal filming begins. If anyone wishes to have this userfied to them for work over the next 12 months out of mainspace, I would think it okay. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 20:29, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not yet - Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photographyDeathlibrarian (talk) 00:44, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to James McTeigue. Not notable as of yet. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 19:37, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.