Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SurveyTool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KaisaL (talk) 02:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SurveyTool

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence or notability -- just routine notices. DGG ( talk ) 06:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete serious lack of notability. This "product" has not accomplished anything noteworthy such as Microsoft Word or Excel, or any Apple products. These "products" have impacted societies and cultures all over the world, in contrast to "SurveyTool". The sources in this article, and sources found on the Web, are concerned with only company issues, a really localized phenomena, not impact or noteworthiness--- Steve Quinn (talk) 08:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:35, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no credible claim of significance here. There are many websites which allow users to create online web surveys; nothing indicates that this one is particularly notable. Neither is this a very popular tool which would perhaps merit an article. I did find some references for its parent company, but overall I still do not see any indication of notability. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:25, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I actually planned to comment sooner (was not aware of the relist), my analysis and searches have simply found nothing better at all for any minimal notability and the listed information says it all. SwisterTwister talk 01:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.