Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Survent[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 18:48, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:47, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I see no coverage apart from the press releases, and even those don't hint about long-term effect on the history of statistics, software or whatever. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 15:10, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Yutsi ^Talk/ Contributions 15:44, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Software for telemarketing surveys, it seems. No specific significance in history, technology, or culture outside its narrow trade. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unsourced, promotional intent clear: no indication of notability. Page author also involved with CfMC, Computer-assisted telephone interviewing and Computer-assisted personal interviewing (all linked from article) so perhaps they all need AfD-ing (linked to this AfD?) as well. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:10, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This topic doesn't appear to have received significant coverage in reliable sources, (after several searches). Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:43, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.