Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sur Plaza Boulevard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 09:57, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sur Plaza Boulevard[edit]

Sur Plaza Boulevard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches simply found nothing to suggest the improvement with the best results here, here and here and the current version is unacceptable and basically this and that website is more of a guide. Some of the last editors are not very active but I'll notify Nyttend and Arpingstone. SwisterTwister talk 00:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Looks like your run-of-the-mill shopping center without evidence of notability. There might be Spanish-language sources, but the lack of a parallel es:wp article means that we can't mine it for sources. Note that there was an es:Sur Plaza Boulevard article, but it was deleted in 2006. Because es:wp seems generally to have lower standards for inclusion than we do, the fact that they deleted an article about this place seems to suggest that it shouldn't exist here, either. Nyttend (talk) 00:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: It appears to be a large open air mall, but its true that the current version of the article doesn't have sufficient sourcing to show notability. A redirect to Asia District, Peru (which does mention the mall) is also an option.--Milowenthasspoken 03:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Doesn't even appear to be an open air mall, but rather a section of a street, with numerous shops and clubs. Search engines show some hits, but most are just mentions, except for this on News. Highbeam and Newspapers returned nothing. Onel5969 TT me 02:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The sources are trivial and do not establish notability. A guide book, a passing mention and an article about a go-cart course. Fails WP:GNG. Me5000 (talk) 21:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.