Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supremacy 1914 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 16:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Supremacy 1914

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There has been issues with notability for a good while. Citation 1 and 3 seem to be linked to the subject. Citation 2 won't open. They use a lot of puffery and seem to let you play the game. Citation 4 also seems to be selling the game to some extent. Citation 5 does not look reliable and looking up Game Genetics leads to nothing. Citation 6 seems to be the most independent but look suspiciously similar to 4. Citation 7 is dead. Citation 8 is a forum. Citation 9 is independent though I have doubts on how reliable it is. Citations 10 and 11 look to either be online arcades or mods for the game. Citation 12 is the website. Being most optimistic, it barely passes wp:N ✶Mitch 199811 ✶ 23:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ✶Mitch 199811 ✶ 23:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete.' I think it's been relaunched on mobile, there are some sources for that, but nothing in RS we'd use for gaming articles. Oaktree b (talk) 00:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt Game fails the Metacritic test and is just as non-notable now as it was in the first AfD, with a total lack of reliable sources. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable, secondary sources. Woodroar (talk) 12:53, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete.. The lack of citations and the big size is alarming... --TheLonelyPather (talk) 14:09, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per nom --Devoke water 21:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.