Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superorganism (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SKCRIT#1. The nominator has withdrawn the nomination and no one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted or redirected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:26, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Superorganism (band)[edit]

Superorganism (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure that this article on a band meets WP:BAND. There has been some coverage, significantly from NME, but their first album is not yet out. Tacyarg (talk) 03:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Withdrawn by nominator following discussion - thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 09:58, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
* Keep: #6 of WP:BAND applies to the band – four members of The Eversons being present. -- AlexanderHovanec (talk) 04:06, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
#2 applies as well; take a look at their discography section. -- AlexanderHovanec (talk) 04:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Easily enough coverage to establish notability. --Michig (talk) 08:16, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Michig above. There's enough coverage, and they've charted on a US Billboard chart now. Ss112 08:32, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.