Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supernatural (TV series)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep. Close obvious bad faith nomination. Joe Chill (talk) 22:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Supernatural (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete, it is a low budget TV show which has an article that is rarely updated and is unnotable as its an unpopular TV show. ToxicWasteGrounds (talk) 21:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Very strong keep. The article is extensively sourced with reliable secondary sources. —C.Fred (talk) 22:23, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. This is a good article (it has 198 solid references! How can this topic be considered "unnotable"?), and the subject is clearly notable. It also appears to be frequently updated -- going back 500 contributions on its history only takes you to September, 2009. I have no idea why this article would be deleted, and might go so far as to suggest that the nominator read up on what constitutes notability in the future before submitting anything to AFD. This makes no sense. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 22:26, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Very strong keep. This seems to be a spurious request for deletion with malicious intent. It's a 5th season TV series on a major US network, being broadcast internationally on several continents, and is generally about as notable as currently running TV shows can get. This delete suggestion is nonsense. JZ (talk) 22:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.