Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superficial (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (X! · talk) · @229 · 04:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Superficial (album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability for albums.Kekkomereq4 (talk) 10:52, 15 February May 2010 (UTC)

Keep and clean up. There is sufficient coverage for the album (Us Magazine has a blurb, People Magazine has an article, and there are a few others), though I really find it hard to believe that recording cost as much to record as a Los Angeles freeway on-ramp does to build. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Album has received enough coverage to satisfy notability requirements. Mattg82 (talk) 23:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The album has significant followers and listeners as demonstrated through Heidi Montag's Twitter page, where she was over 1,000,000 followers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.106.243.146 (talk)
- The problem with big numbers is that we don't tend to use them as reliable sources. That, and the article can stand on its own at this point. =) --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 05:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: per Dennis the Tiger. -- Jack1755 (talk) 21:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Significant coverage for this appropriately named album exists in multiple reliable sources; meets WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS. Gongshow ^Talk 17:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a legitimate pop culture news item and its media appeal is due to the flux of the music industry and this marks it as a representative part of the current trend of popular music.Danickstr (talk) 22:13, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As above Fixer23 (talk) 04:00, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.