Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Smash Bros. Revolution Characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 05:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Super Smash Bros. Revolution Characters[edit]

Speculative list of characters in an upcoming video game. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Randwicked Alex B 01:09, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per crystal ball, WP:NOT. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 01:14, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Pboyd04 02:29, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vapourware gamecruft, also as Yoda would say "crystal balls WIkipedia is not". Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 02:46, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above, WP:NOT a crystal ball --Lightdarkness 04:42, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete crystalballismcruft. Cyde Weys 2M-VOTE 05:20, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable unencyclopedic original research crystal ball. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-16 05:36Z
Delete per nom. VegaDark 07:46, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:V since it's pure speculation at this point. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 18:25, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Speculation. Deathawk 20:45, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Mushroom 11:44, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a crystall ball so foggy that even most of the hoaxsters who failed the James Randi challenge would laugh it out. I mean, look at that list. If one's to write a speculative article (not saying that would be at all advisable in the first place, mind you), at least compile them from some actual guestimative polls or something and not try the "hey, Golden Sun ruled, bet half of those characters appear here" from-top-of-author's-mind approach. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 17:39, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.