Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Rail Adventures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:40, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Super Rail Adventures[edit]

Appears to be fake, nothing on Google. --RandomOrca2 (talk) 21:57, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No google hits[1]; of the two external links on the page, one goes to a page that does not reference the article subject, and the other goes to a page that doesn't exist (but the page it was probably intended to go to doesn't reference the article subject either). Agreed that it's probably fake, but even if it does exist, it seems to be completely non-notable. --Smeazel (talk) 22:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:V. Appears to be something that exists only in a kid's mind (or as drawings in a school notebook). Deor (talk) 01:49, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion also applies (with the same rationale) to the second article added to the nom. Deor (talk) 11:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I restored the AfD that was removed and placed a warning on the talk page. Also requested him to supply any real references he might have. This appears to be something that was made up. Turlo Lomon (talk) 03:59, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hoaxalicious. JuJube (talk) 06:44, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 09:00, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence this exists and "references" are merely to the media it is based on not to anything to do with the comic. (Emperor (talk) 13:28, 22 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Delete as hoax. Edward321 (talk) 14:11, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Article author has removed Afd tag a second time. They have also created the related article Duckbillz, which I think should be bundled with this for deletion. Edward321 (talk) 01:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. It'll save us having to come back and do this all over again. (Emperor (talk) 02:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]
  - Decided to be bold and added it. JuJube (talk) 13:55, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no notability. Deb (talk) 13:46, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.