Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Monsters Ate My Condo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Super Monsters Ate My Condo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is about a non notable game. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:30, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the fact that it relies on one (unreliable) source and is written in a slightly promotional style. G S Palmer (talk) 23:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think what keeps me coming back to AfD are these little gems that you look at and say, "What the fuck is this shit" and start penning the deletion argument in your head... until you hit the search. This game has a whole lot of coverage that undeniably meets the GNG:

Moral of the story? Don't judge an AfD by its current sourcing. czar ♔ 19:15, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@G S Palmer and Vanjagenije, did you see the new sources? czar ♔ 04:20, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Czar. The game was reviewed by TouchArcade, 148apps, GameZebo, and Pocket Gamer, and there are many news articles covering the game. Meets the WP:GNG. --Odie5533 (talk) 11:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Czar. Jimqode (talk) 12:23, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I edited the article to reflect NPOV and to include a few of Czar's sources. Andrew³²⁷ 03:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.