Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Mario World 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 17:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Super Mario World 3[edit]

(Find video game sources: "Super Mario World 3" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

a fake artical Digifan23 (talk) 21:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Page has no content (and nor do any previous revisions) except an infobox with a picture of a different game. Can't find any reliable sources. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) czar ♔ 14:23, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete A3 as devoid of content. Also qualifies as G3 hoax. Alternatively, redirect to Super Mario (series)#Games. Even restoring the redirect to Yoshi's Island DS would have been fine too (even though the game doesn't even appear to go by that title). Redirects are cheap and the series article is the best target for a game that doesn't exist in any form. I'll add that the nom doesn't exactly have a deletion rationale and it would have been fine to just boldly revert the recent edits back to the redirect—it's worth attempting to engage the page history and/or talk page before coming to AfD. If against redirecting, page may qualify for A3 or G3 speedy. czar ♔ 14:23, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Even if it's not a hoax, it's an empty page. Redirects can be created later at editors' discretion, but I don't see any pressing need for one. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:26, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.