Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Hits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:51, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Super Hits[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability. Nothing but a directory. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:51, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'd have to agree to Delete. As a list, it doesn't necessarily need to meet notability requirements, but few of the albums have their own article (thankfully) and they would all have to be individually or collectively sourced to warrant this list. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 19:11, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:10, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources, no clear indications of notability. Sven Manguard _Talk 00:47, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.