Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super (Hand Symbol)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:50, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Super (Hand Symbol)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find too much significant coverage for this movie. While there are some news articles about it, it seems still somewhat speculative. fetchcomms☛ 20:55, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete "Upcoming" is synonymous to non-notable. The article may be reintroduced when the film is finally out and has significant coverage, but this stub is not noteworthy. De728631 (talk) 20:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- With respects, WP:CRYSTAL and WP:GNG could actually show "upcoming" as indeed notable if it has enough extended coverage. That said, I still think (as stated below) that the author might be able to to improve it to show meeting CRYSTAL and NFF if userfied. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note to Admin This page Super(Hand_symbol) is redirect to the article under discussion. --Haruth (talk) 21:29, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL -- RP459 ^Talk/_{Contributions} 22:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice toward recreation. Userfy to author if requested, as the film project is searchable and has received covarge that approaches requirements of WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF toward coverage, and such will allow the author to expand and further source the article. There is the recent coverage...NDTV, One India 1, One India 2, India Glitz, Sify, One India 3, Mid Day, and perhaps a hundred other articles since 2002. Such extensive coverage of even an unmade film could merit a return as an article if properly sourced for its production hell. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:00, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NFF and WP:N - not in production, still "upcoming", and no real significant coverage. Seems mostly just press releases and notes that its still coming. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:41, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.