Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperPower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 19:13, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SuperPower

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete- Fails WP:N and WP:V. Only sources are a fansite and a page that links to eBay and Amazon. Essentially a fancruft article about an obscure computer game. Worldruler20 (talk) 03:39, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep popular game that spawned a major sequel (SuperPower 2). Nomination only describes current article state and not potential, as a quick search reveals. Game has been covered by Gameplanet, Softpedia, CNet Taiwan, OnlineWelton, PC Welt, Computer Gaming World (no longer available online), ITNews, and other reliable sources. The idea that this game is unverifiable is downright laughable, IMO. --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:07, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is a name of a video game, thus it is worthy to at least be defined. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kewingk (talk • contribs) 05:04, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per Mr.B. I also found this and this. Joe Chill (talk) 07:27, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Enough sourcing has been found. Quantpole (talk) 10:50, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. —Worldruler20 (talk) 03:39, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 16:24, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the sources found by Thaddeus. MuZemike 19:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's both notable and verifiable, sources from a quick google include: GameSpot review, IGN Preview, 1up/CGW review, full review on Allgame. What problem? Someone another 16:07, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.