Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super16 (film school)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep--Ymblanter (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Super16 (film school)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Only degree awarding institutions have inherent notability. There is minimal third party coverage of this and the sources provided are mostly film industry related rather than third party. LibStar (talk) 14:59, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:14, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Seems to easily pass WP:ORG. There is significant coverage in secondary sources, including feature articles about the school in the well-regarded Danish film magazine Ekko ("They come in through the backdoor" (2007), "The Quality Swings at Super16" (2010)) as well as in national newspapers like Berlingske Tidende and Politiken ("Another way to the big screen" (2008), "Backway to the Big Screen" (2009).) — CactusWriter ^(talk) 17:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep with kudos and thanks to CactusWriter. To source a Danish organization, Danish language sources are perfectly fine. Through WP:NRVE we can see that WP:ORG is met. Quite nice that he added them, huh nominator? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 06:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.