Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summer Street

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 17:10, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Summer Street[edit]

No sources, nothing with in the article to say why it's important and notible since all it states is that it's a street named after Summer and that it forms part of an Highway. Bidgee (talk) 19:12, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:N and WP:V. Article is full of original research. It is claimed to be a road which goes through a city. Might also nominate the other 3 "seasonal" streets in the city. Edison (talk) 03:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An article of a kind that could be written about any street in Australia. The article does not attempt to establish that there is anything notable about this street. No references, no citations - all unsourced material. Dolphin51 (talk) 06:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Mitchell Highway. Summer Street appears to be the name of a portion of this main road. The Mitchell Highway article needs more content anyway. There is no need for outright deletion as the redirect would be useful to have. --Polaron | Talk 02:00, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless to merge and redirct an article that has no sources and a street that most likely is widely used world wide. Bidgee (talk) 02:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do those streets have articles? If so, a disambiguation page should be made then. Outright deletion is still not the most appropriate course of action. --Polaron | Talk 02:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe not but someone who comes in searchs for Summer Street but isn't after the Summer Street thats on the Mitchell Highway (IE: Should be deleted and only used if there is other articles that are only about Summer Street, Location). Outright deletion is appropriate for something that has no sources and the only content that would stay if merged would just be the two images. Articles such as Sturt Highway and Olympic Highway don't use what streets that form the highways since it's not Encyclopedic. Bidgee (talk) 02:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the article does nothing to assert or prove notability. Based on some research, this does appear to be a historic routing and as such I've made a referenced note about this in the Mitchell Highway article. - Dravecky (talk) 23:03, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.