Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summer Love (Sherbet song)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:58, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Summer Love (Sherbet song)[edit]
- Summer Love (Sherbet song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails general notability. — Statυs (talk) 22:16, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- (edit conflict) Delete - WP:NSONGS tells us to ditch songs that cannot extend beyond a stub. It also tells us that Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. In this case, the article says the song charted at #1 for 2 weeks, however the lack of significant coverage that can be found to even verify that it really charted far outweighs the NSONGS guideline. --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 00:42, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sherbet (band) — although I removed the prod — I did find that there is hardly any coverage for the single. WP:SONGS says that song articles that are stubs should be merged to the artist page, though there is hardly any information to merge, so a simple redirect appears appropriate.Keep per expansions. Till I Go Home talk edits 01:40, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Keep. Quite astounded that this is even nominated. First #1 single from an iconic band is a snow keep to me. The common title and pre-internet time period makes online searching futile, but WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES. I'll contact some of the editors with access to good Australian music books for assistance. The-Pope (talk) 02:07, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I also felt that the song is notable — due to being #1, which is why I removed the prod in the first place. I will continue checking the article, and if sources are added, I will change my vote to keep. THanks. Till I Go Home talk edits 02:16, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep No. 1 on Kent Music Report weekly singles chart, No. 4 on its End of Year chart, and won Most Popular Australian Single at the annual King of Pop Awards. The article is now Start class and I've chucked in some refs.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:38, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw nomination Article has been expanded a huge amount; notability has now been established. — Statυs (talk) 08:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.