Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summer Bishil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete; page was already deleted by User:DragonflySixtyseven, I'm just cleaning up this AfD. Peyna 03:58, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Summer Bishil[edit]
Non notable. She's 17. She's appeared on one soap opera. Come on. Not notable in the least. Woohookitty(cat scratches) 05:05, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Couldn't this have been speedied? TheRingess 05:07, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope, because the original version referred to notable roles, which is an obvious claim of notability. Disputed claims must go to AFD. --Rob 05:48, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable for now. — TheKMantalk 05:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vanity. Dbtfz 05:21, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable biography. I don't think age is relevant, but I agree that one or two unnamed uncredited soap opera appearances is nothign. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-17 05:25Z
- Delete. MAN SHE'S HOT!!!. Not notable though. :( —gorgan_almighty 15:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This is probably ad spam by the agency that employs her. Should probably keep an eye on the user who created the article. —gorgan_almighty 15:24, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Everything is possible, but one should be cautious about such a charge. The user you accused, tried, unsuccesfully to upload an image they took from imdb. Now, her agency has a good quality image of her, which they could easily have used, and would wish to use. They wouldn't need to take one from imdb (who have protection that causes the resulting image to be corrupt, see Image:Summer.gif). After all, its probably the agency that supplied imdb. If the agency "got it right" for imdb, they would get it right here. We can and should delete things that don't qualify, without ascribing motives. --Rob 17:45, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This is probably ad spam by the agency that employs her. Should probably keep an eye on the user who created the article. —gorgan_almighty 15:24, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Closing admin, don't forget to delete the picture too. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Stifle 14:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.