Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SummerSlam (2011)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep, nominator withdrawn the nomination, only keep votes. This is a non-admin close. 123Ħeðŋeħøŋ456 : Create an account!! 12:37, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note, nominator has withdrawn this deletion request, see below Chzz ► 12:27, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- SummerSlam (2011) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD as "Future event, not yet notable; WP:CRYSTAL, WP:GNG" Chzz ► 21:35, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment By the time this AFD has closed (assuming it last at least four days) it will no longer be a future event or violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Perhaps that reasoning should be struck? I think GNG can still be applied fairly. Hazardous Matt (talk) 21:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Don't see the point in deleting this when the event will be held in less time than it will likely take the AFD to close. By that time, the sources that cover wrestling figure to have more than enough coverage to satisfy GNG. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 01:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep per WP:CRYSTAL's first exception , which reads "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place." This event meets both of those criteria. Umbralcorax (talk) 01:22, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Seconded When there can be an article on the 2020 Summer Olympics (9 YEARS away), there can be an article on SummerSlam (3 DAYS away). Blocpark (talk) 08:28, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Umbralcorax.--Dcheagle 03:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sufficient notability established for event that will take place in 3 days. Seems to be a bad faith nomination. GaryColemanFan (talk) 04:52, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep I think it has long been established that Chzz nominates WWE articles because of a personal grudge. AFD will close after event, hence bad faith nomination. Blocpark (talk) 08:26, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw requested deletion - apologies; I mis-read the date; I didn't realise it was just a few days away. Chzz ► 12:27, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.