Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumita Prabhakar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to keep and w/o prejudice to a speedy renomination. If there are no comments favoring retention I often close AfDs with a single !vote favoring deletion as a "soft delete." In this case, I can't go there and this has already been relisted twice. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sumita Prabhakar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unreliable and trivial coverage. Does not pass WP:N ToT89 (talk) 18:47, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:08, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:08, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep On he face of it, she does pass WP:N and is perhaps not responsible for the weakness of some references. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:16, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I cannot see any particular reason for notability. She seems to be a doctor (which I admire). However, I do not see anything remarkable which has attracted lots of attention. I am particularly unhappy at the quality of the references used as citation for the "Awards". Most of the reliable references are actually not about her, but only seem to be quoting her. For example,
[1] Nothing in detail about her. (Although reference itself is reliable)

[2] - Citation is actually the website of NGO founded by her

[3] This is used as a citation for an award "IMA Doctor Achievement Award by Indian Medical Association in recognition of distinguished service in the field of Medicine in 2008", but the website is actually a listing website

[4] Amar Ujala is probably the only decent reference I found. But the award is not a significant award. Although presented by the governor, it is an award at an event.

[5] Youtube video used as citation for "Global Business and Excellence Award by Amar Singh in recognition of distinguished service in the field of infertility treatment". But this "Global Business and Excellence Award" seems to be an award by a private company.

Other awards seem to be relatively minor ones at a local level (restricted to Dehradun, Uttarakhand). I do appreciate her work and I believe she could be notable one day, but right now I don't think the level of coverage is enough.--DreamLinker (talk) 22:46, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 03:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.