Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultan Maktari
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @224 · 04:23, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sultan Maktari[edit]
- Sultan Maktari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Autobiography with minimal sourcing. Research shows that he has one borderline claim to notability—winning a 1st and 2nd place in a font design competition—but I couldn't find enough references about the subject to source the information he provided. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 07:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm not seeing any evidence of Notability, nor of Reliable Sourcing. The thing reads like a resume, or a curriculum vitae, and is likely someone's vanity page, either for their self, a family member, or a friend. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 11:14, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 04:53, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable. Clubmarx (talk) 04:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete He might actually be notable, but we need some better sources. I think we'd need to wait for them to write an acceptable article. This is our unfortunate cultural bias, but we nonetheless need people who can find sources for the material DGG ( talk ) 02:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.