Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultan Mahmood (social scientist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP is not for posting CVs, we have LinkedIn for that. Randykitty (talk) 18:32, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sultan Mahmood (social scientist)[edit]

Sultan Mahmood (social scientist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable: fails WP:GNG and WP:PROF. AhmadLX (talk) 15:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 18:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Notability is not inherit. The Professor test mentions independent sources several times. The "Specific criteria notes" #1 includes: "Simply having authored a large number of published academic works is not considered sufficient to satisfy Criterion 1". From what I have "not found", also considering the large amount of needless and unsourced material, the subject fails the professor test so would have problems satisfying GNG. Otr500 (talk) 14:04, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.