Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sullivan County Tennessee Sheriff's Office
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete by Majorly in line with the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gatlinburg Public Services. WjBscribe 16:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sullivan County Tennessee Sheriff's Office (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Other articles created by this editor and nominated for deletion include:
- Bristol Tennessee Police Department
- Cut Bank Police Department
- Gallatin County Sheriff's Office
- Gatlinburg Fire Department
- Gatlinburg Public Services
- Kingsport Police Department
- Pigeon Forge Public Services
- Roanoke City Sheriff's Office
- Roanoke County Sheriff's Office
- Sevier County Sheriff's Office
Nom - fails notability. See also what Wikipedia is not. Rklawton 01:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As before. The only source is its own site. Undoubtedly local newspaper stories can be found, but unless something particularly dramatic happened there involving the sheriff's office, they would probably best be considered incidental mentions. As with other topics, probably large city police departments are notable, and sheriff's offices for really major counties, but not in general. merge into the country article.
DGG 04:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Sullivan County, Tennessee for the same reason I gave at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sevier County Sheriff's Office. Information about public services in a county is OK within an article about that county. During the merge, the formatting of the page should be fixed as well. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge all into parent articles. Individual city/county services are generally best treated with a small section in the parent article. There do exist exceptions, for example, such as New York City Fire Department which has enough history and notability independent of the general NYC government to warrant its own article. The general rule of thumb is that if the section would make the parent article too long, go ahead and fork it out - but a detailed list of jurisdictions and accounting of employee positions is WP:NOT and when you excise that you're left with basically "it is the Sheriff's office that serves Sullivan County". Arkyan • (talk) 15:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge all into parent articles, per my comments on the first listing of the group, and per views of editors expressed at (historical) proposed guideline WP:LOCAL.Edison 17:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.