Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sukhi Ghuman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:39, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sukhi Ghuman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination for User:Newz100!* - reason given for their nomination is: "I am Sukhi Ghuman, a non notable private person and wish the page about me to be deleted." I am taking no position on this AfD myself. Iffy★Chat -- 18:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is an atrocious article about a person whose only claim to notability is being affiliated with a non-notable business. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:28, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TNT. This article is heavily referenced, but most of the references (and most of the article) are devoted to a long list of non-notable awards he has won. He does rate a mention in some of the other references, but not enough to build a biography. I think it's possible that a real article could be written about him someday, particularly if he gets more involved in sport - but this isn't it. --MelanieN (talk) 02:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.