Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suka Suka Super Seven Dan Idola Cilik Dalam Habis Gelap Menuju Terang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Super7 (band). Our policy strongly recommends against deletion during a merge, and no argument was made for the pre-merge deletion. j⚛e decker ^talk 19:04, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suka Suka Super Seven Dan Idola Cilik Dalam Habis Gelap Menuju Terang[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

it brought in less than $20,000 - not significant except as a failure Legacypac (talk) 06:11, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:38, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:38, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and merge to Super7 (band). No evidence of sufficient notability that indicates a standalone article. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 22:38, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

merge and redirect per the consensus to ignore this thing receiving coverage in Indonesian sources (sigh) ~~Keep~~ per having sourcable notability to Indonesia. Yes, Indonesian topics are difficult to source, but when sources exist an article is usually improvable... just takes some doing. That it was a box-office fail is not a valid deletion rationale. And while I will never see this myself, the poor stub that was nominated is now somewhat better. What say Legacypac? Kikichugirl?Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 20:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect/merge into Super7_(band)#Filmography. While Sidomi News is possibly RS (I say "possibly" rather than probably because the site is wholly devoted to dubious tabloid-style celebrity gossip), the rest of the references appear to be promotional sites, theater listings and brief film synopses. Pax 11:17, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and merge to Super7 (band). No evidence of sufficient notability that indicates a standalone article. @NnAs (talk) 06:03, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Super7 (band), which is also pretty thin on verifiable notability. Dai Pritchard (talk) 23:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I just flagged this reviewing new articles. Happy to see it merged and redirected as per other editors. Legacypac (talk) 10:15, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.