Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sujata Banerjee
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deletion, as the article was an only very slightly modified copy of the web page https://research.vmware.com/researchers/sujata-banerjee, most of the text being word for word identical. There is, of course, no prejudice against creation of a new article on the same subject without copyright infringement. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:17, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Sujata Banerjee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable academic. Deletion per WP:NOTLINKEDIN / WP:NOTCV. A WP:BEFORE indicates a dearth of reliable sources ([1]). Chairing programs etc =/= notability. No depth or persistence of coverage to pass WP:ANYBIO. — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 13:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
DeleteFails PROF and does not meet GNG/BIO. Lourdes 17:00, 26 June 2017 (UTC)- Keep. Meets WP:PROF, though the present article provides no evidence. According to google scholar, her most cited paper "DevoFlow: Scaling flow management for high-performance networks"
…, P Yalagandula, P Sharma, S Banerjee - ACM SIGCOMM …, 2011 has been cited 805 times. The second, 742 times. Then 227, 173, 137, 121, 116, 115, 114. 107, 106 We measure influence in science by citations. Usually, even in heavily cited fields, one or two papers with over 100 citations each is enough for notability . She has 7. DGG ( talk ) 02:31, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
- DGG makes sense. I had missed the fact that the Sujata Banerjee erstwhile of HP is the same Sujata Banerjee of Dell. I am striking my vote. Thanks. Lourdes 15:45, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.