Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suha N. Kayum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 00:44, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suha N. Kayum

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable as an academic. Does not pass GNG, she was briefly quoted a couple of times as an Aramco analyst/scientist. Chuka Chief_talk 21:06, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:53, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:53, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:54, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:54, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reluctantly. The two times the subject name came up in publications were both single quotes in the context of articles on the subject's employer. Both are also essentially the same statement "Aramco builds oil fields to last for centuries." I was only able to find fourteen papers or patents and not any with citations so PROF1 seems unlikely. The awards mentioned in the article are either for service to a scientific society, rather than in recognition of accomplishment, or an award from a trade show organizer. As a result, PROF2 also seems unlikely. PROF3-8 wouldn't apply in this case. MoneciousTriffid (talk) 01:25, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.