Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sugar Man (diabetes education)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 02:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sugar Man (diabetes education)[edit]

Sugar Man (diabetes education) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Somewhat promotional article for teaching device without any evidene of notability at all. The only ref I can find is [1], on p.20., but this is a very difficult title for searching, DGG ( talk ) 04:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 13:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 13:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 13:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not notable. I coud find basically nothing about this technique, and the article references provide nothing. This article was created five years ago by an SPA and has been basically untouched ever since. Kudos to DGG for finding and nominating it. --MelanieN (talk) 14:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the WP:SPA had also objected to a notability claim before. Neonchameleon (talk) 18:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - A minor education technique like this doesn't deserve a page here. - Shiftchange (talk) 13:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.