Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudeepa Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The consensus is that WP:NACTOR is not met at this point in the subject's career. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:27, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sudeepa Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. M S Hassan (talk | contributions) 06:48, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Television, Advertising, and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: meets WP:NACTOR with at least 2 significant roles in notable productions. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Her only notable role is in Baalveer, rest are recurring/guest roles. M S Hassan (talk | contributions) 06:21, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. Her role in Action Replayy is also significant. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:07, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not really, her role in Action Replayy is recurring; I have watched the movie, and she is not even listed as part of the starring cast. M S Hassan (talk | contributions) 16:02, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Still, it can be considered significant. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:29, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Punjab-related deletion discussions. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Clearly fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR, nothing is special. Youknow? (talk) 17:16, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. With only one significant role in Baalveer, the actress fails WP:NACTOR. No other roles were notable and significant that got any coverage. RangersRus (talk) 15:02, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.