Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudan Medical Archives
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:41, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Sudan Medical Archives (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page pas prodded for more than 7 days but since I was not 100% sure that it has to be deleted, I suggest that we discuss it further. I wonder if we should keep it and rework it. Magioladitis (talk) 11:55, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 01:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 01:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 01:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 01:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹ 15:57, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹ 15:57, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:27, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:27, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Delete A quick search for "Sudan Medical Archives" does not yield much internet coverage, much less an official website, so article fails WP:GNG, not to mention the countless empty sections and improperly formatted, broken source links. BenLinus1214talk 21:20, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.