Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subsoap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:33, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Subsoap[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spotted this and the one game they seem to have produced - Faerie Solitaire - when just reading up on Solitaire on a whim. Research on this shows nothing special - just some mentions on some blogs at best. Website as linked to is entirely content free. Not seeing notability. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 04:36, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subsoap is not notable, although I think the game they have produced is notable. I think WP:NOTINHERITED comes into play here. - Pmedema (talk) 19:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:52, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not enough significant coverage from reliable sources. --Teancum (talk) 14:01, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.