Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhash Ware

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 05:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Subhash Ware[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. election candidates are not notable and there is little else to be said. Forms part of a series of bio articles created by AAP-centric contributors in the run-up to the 2014 Indian general elections. Sitush (talk) 16:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:POLITICIAN. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 00:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from the election candidature , he is into the national executive post for the party, which is http://www.aamaadmiparty.org/national-executive here.--Winchetan (talk) 06:47, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Subhash ware has 3 decades history of social work well documented in various newspapers and government organisations Smileamiledr (talk) 01:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plenty of social work and references go against the decision of deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smileamiledr (talk • contribs) 22:42, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I second Smileamiledr. Subhash Ware deserved an article even before his nomination for LS candidature. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myaoon (talk • contribs) 10:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This person Sitush is acting in a biased manner. He appears to be of right wing ideology and is therefore maliciously deleting even legitimate information. Proof is that he removed the association of Subhash ware with the SM J oshi foundation even though a refernce shows clear association ( on frivolous ground that it does not say @honorary@ which he could have easily edited. How do we report him for bias?Smileamiledr (talk) 23:45, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

a fact based on a secondary source "Sangad,a secular and non political forum lists Subhash Ware's association with social organisations Rastra Seva Dal, S.M.Joshi Socialist Foundation and Maharastra Socialist Front in the context of rural development movements.[4]" was deleted by Sitush maliciously even though reference 4 directs to the websiteSmileamiledr (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eh? The article says "Subhash Ware is secretary of the S M Joshi Socialist Foundation" and that agrees with the source. Why you think I've removed it is beyond me, although I've no idea whether the S M Joshi Foundation is any more significant than my local cub scout group. Neither the article nor the source says "honorary" but all that words means is that he doesn't get paid for his duties in respect of that organisation. I think that you really need to get a grip on what is and is not notable in an article: the guy may be a member of a swimming club, for all I know, but that doesn't mean we mention it.

Accusing me of right-wing bias isn't going to get you anything other than possibly a warning for personal attacks, especially since I'm regularly accused of bias by competing interests across a massive range of articles. At various times, I've been accused of being left-wing, right-wing, anti-Muslim, anti-Hindu, pro-Pakistan, pro-India etc, all of which contradictory accusations tend to suggest that I am in fact neutral. - Sitush (talk) 10:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.