Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhash Jha Vines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:28, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subhash Jha Vines

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article asserts significance, so not probably not A7 and I don't feel tagging it as G3. However, this individual does not meet GNG. The article makes some claims regarding Tech Guruji, however that is run by a different individual: Gaurav Chaudhary. I think User:Tech Guruji's username is of concern here, and the article was rejected a couple of times at AfC.Eostrix (talk) 08:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (talk) 08:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (talk) 08:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (talk) 08:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing indicates notability. Could qualify for speedy deletion under WP:G11 as it's an WP:AUTOBIO. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:50, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:51, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.