Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stupid Morning Bullshit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim#Digital Series. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 07:36, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid Morning Bullshit[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Internet radio program with no properly sourced indication of notability per WP:NMEDIA, which is not the same thing as mere existence. Of the three sources here, two are primary ones (the parent service's own website and the show's own Instagram account), and the one that counts as a reliable source isn't about the program, but just namechecks its existence a single time in an article about the parent company. This is not the kind of sourcing it takes to get an internet radio program over our inclusion rules for media content. Bearcat (talk) 21:08, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Stupid afternoon article. Bearian (talk) 22:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bearian (talk · contribs), would you support a redirect to List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim#Digital Series? Cunard (talk) 03:00, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would go with that. Bearian (talk) 18:57, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Bearian (talk · contribs). Would you also support preserving the history? Cunard (talk) 05:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That is my understanding. Bearian (talk) 13:19, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim#Digital Series (with the history preserved under the redirect), where the show is mentioned, in lieu of deletion. The show created in September 2015 and is relatively new, so it has had little time to receive significant coverage in reliable sources. Preserving the history will allow the redirect to be undone easily if sources surface in the future. Cunard (talk) 03:00, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested by Cunard. While I don't know if Bearcat would support the redirect, it seems sensible a solution enough. I really don't have any view about saving the history. Material sourced from primary sources tends to be promotional, and it's never to the benefit of an encyclopedia to support that. Lourdes 07:02, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete & then redirect to List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim#Digital Series. I don't see a need to preserve the article history as the sources are solely promotional. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article does not merely contain primary sources. It also has material sourced to third-party sources like http://splitsider.com/2016/06/47-men-0-women-why-doesnt-adult-swim-order-shows-from-female-creators/, http://www.adweek.com/news/television/adult-swim-expands-new-daytime-digital-slate-keep-millennials-watching-171412, and http://www.vice.com/en_au/read/comedy-legends-reflect-on-15-years-of-adult-swim. Cunard (talk) 05:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nordic Nightfury 07:49, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.