Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studio 54 Radio (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mkdw ^talk 01:52, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Studio 54 Radio[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable radio station; lacks significant coverage in reliable sources, failing WP:GNG / WP:NMEDIA. No particular cultural notability or influence. (resisted since there were no comments at previous AFD) -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Maybe I am looking at the wrong one, but here are some references [1], [2], [3]. Normally I would vote to redirect to Sirius but this one looks like it has significant coverage for standalone notability. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:50, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Studio 54 - the radio station is based on the defunct nightclub Studio 54 which already contains a section on the radio station. On the other hand there are some articles that discuss the station so it may be notable in its own right. I think until the article is long enough I think a merge makes the most sense for now. Borderline case for me though, but I don't think it should be deleted. FuriouslySerene (talk) 20:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 00:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:18, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:00, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.