Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studia Islamica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. A valid rationale for deletion relative to Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Deletion policy is not present. For example, per WP:NEXIST, notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. See WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid rationales. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Studia Islamica[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unsourced since years. If it needs inclusion it needs to be improved from scratch with valid sources. Can't be there in mainspace in such a poor condition. Maliner (talk) 08:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Wikipedia is not a place for the promotion of such journals. Maliner (talk) 08:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep one of the oldest, most authoritative and widely-cited academic journals in its field. Mccapra (talk) 11:07, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.