Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Student of the Year

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:25, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Student of the Year[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable article with no content except for categories. --Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 15:19, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - how the hell has this article lasted since 2005? No references, no real content (one thing is a blatant dictionary definition), and no indication of importance. Bin this, then move the Indian film article here. Lukeno94 (talk) 15:39, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is nothing worth keeping in this unsourced stub article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:42, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into the Teen Challenge article - I say merge, but there's not much is there really - I'd be happy to go with a delete consensus too. ---- _nonsense ferret 18:51, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not established. - Shiftchange (talk) 12:47, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The Indian film looks far more notable where Ghits are concerned. Far too generic a title and should at least be named Teen Challenge Student of the Year, if the award is kept. Can't seem to find any non-self referential sources though. Funny ^Pika! 02:40, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rather Queensland Teen Challenge Student of the Year. Local chapter of a international organisation. Funny ^Pika! 02:56, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Funny ^Pika! 02:56, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No WP:SIGCOV to establish notability. Mkdw ^talk 01:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.