The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Copyvio. --Ryan Delaneytalk 09:33, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It reads like a brochure. All images are unverified too. Rhobite 04:32, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Every chunk I pasted into a Google search was a copyvio from pages like this and this, the official website. Should this just speedied as "blatant infringement"? —HorsePunchKid→龜 04:43, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete for copyvio, marked as such. Chick Bowen 04:51, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, I should have checked Google. Yeah it's a copyvio. Rhobite 05:01, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
