Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Denman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 00:34, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart Denman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Triptothecottage (talk) 04:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:NHOCKEY. It might be worth taking a more comprehensive approach here; there are lots of articles about Australian hockey players, almost none of whom meet NHOCKEY. All articles about an Australian who's only played in Australia should just be PRODed instead of brought to AFD (since the AIHL doesn't appear on WP:NHOCKEY/LA). Madg2011 (talk) 18:46, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The news anchor by the same name is more notable. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 18:46, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.