Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strickland Propane
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to King of the Hill. Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strickland Propane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Prod removed. Fictional store with no assertion of notability. Personally, I could not find any third-party sources for this through Google. Whatever can be found about the aforementioned that makes the store an important part of the plot can fit on King of the Hill. « ₣M₣ » 23:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. The store plays a central role in this long-running, important TV series. Majoreditor (talk) 02:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Sounds like you're proposing a merge not a delete. If so,close this, & try adding and discussing a merge at the talk page. DGG (talk) 04:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- To clarify, the article goes into detail about the store without specifying what makes it "play a central role in this long-running, important TV series." Whatever can be found about that statement can fit on King of the Hill. All it just basically says (without going into insignificant details) is that the main character has a job there. « ₣M₣ » 13:14, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Merge to King of the Hill where it has notability and merit. No need for a separate article. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Get rid of this separate article somehow. No reliable secondary sources, and since the show uses an episodic format there's hardly a subject here to begin with. WillOakland (talk) 05:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to King of the Hill where it is currently inadequately covered. RMHED (talk) 18:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.